Skip to main content
  • Conference Abstract
  • Open access
  • Published:

P.05 Development and Validation of a Novel Centroid Method for Estimating Effective Reflection Time

Abstract

Background

The time at which reflected waves arrive at central arteries has an important influence on ventricular afterload. Current methods of estimating reflection time (RT), including zero-crossover [1], inflection-point [2], and foot methods [3], use only a single point on the pressure waveforms, and their accuracy is uncertain because no ground truth reflection time (GTRT) has been available. We here introduce a novel centroid method that accounts for the entire waveform and compare the accuracy of RT methods by comparison with a GTRT for the first time.

Methods

Using computational linear wave-tracking, we followed an impulse as it traversed through an anatomical model of the systemic arterial circulation; GTRT was calculated as the weighted mean arrival time of reflected waves at the inlet. Linear convolution of the resulting impulse response with a realistic input waveform (flow waveform multiplied by characteristic impedance) produced a pressure waveform that was separated into forward and backward components. The time difference between the centroids of the backward pressure and input waveforms was taken as RT in the centroid method. We also conducted a parameter sweep (n = 300) on the model to test the accuracy and robustness of the various methods.

Result

Compared to the zero-crossover, inflection-point, and foot methods, the centroid method estimated RT with the least mean difference to GTRT (104, 107, 171 vs. 8 ms; p < 0.001) and least standard deviation (34, 109, 97 vs. 28 ms).

Conclusion

The centroid method substantially improved accuracy and robustness for estimating RT compared with current methods.

Figure

References

  1. Segers P, Rietzschel ER, De Buyzere ML, De Bacquer D, Van Bortel LM, De Backer G, et al. Assessment of pressure wave reflection: getting the timing right! Physiol Meas 2007;28:1045–56.

  2. Mitchell GF, Parise H, Benjamin EJ, Larson MG, Keyes MJ, Vita JA, et al. Changes in arterial stiffness and wave reflection with advancing age in healthy men and women: the Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension 2004;43:1239–45.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Torjesen AA, Wang N, Larson MG, Hamburg NM, Vita JA, Levy D, et al. Forward and backward wave morphology and central pressure augmentation in men and women in the Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension 2014;64:259–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avinash Kondiboyina.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kondiboyina, A., Smolich, J.J., Cheung, M.M.H. et al. P.05 Development and Validation of a Novel Centroid Method for Estimating Effective Reflection Time. Artery Res 26 (Suppl 1), S25 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.201209.019

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.201209.019

Keywords