Skip to main content
  • Conference Abstract
  • Open access
  • Published:

YI 2.5 Direct Measurement of Stiffness Index β of Superficial Arteries Without Blood Pressure Estimation

Abstract

Background

Arterial stiffness index (β) is a clinically accepted vascular metric, calculated from arterial pressure and diameter obtained simultaneously from a single arterial site [1]. Hence, accurate measurement of β can only be performed on arteries where pressure can be recorded along with the diameter. We present a method to evaluate β from superficial arteries using arterial force (F) and diameter (D) waveforms, employing mathematical models (shown below) exploiting the non-linear pressure-diameter relationship [2], without requiring absolute pressure.

Methods

Pilot functionality assessment was performed on eight participants (24 ± 5 years). A custom-developed frequencymatched system, combining single-element ultrasound and force-sensing transducers, was used to measure D and F waveforms from the common carotid artery. A hemodynamic-loop was formed from these measures and optimised to eliminate viscous components, and evaluate the elastic stiffness index β. Traditional β-formula [2] yielded reference values for comparison.

$${f_e}\,(t)\, = \,{f_{mx}}\, \times \,\left( {{{{e^{\beta \left( {{{D(t)} \over {{D_d}}}\, - 1} \right)}}\, - \,1} \over {{e^{\beta \left( {{{{D_s}} \over {{D_d}}}\, - 1} \right)}}\, - \,1}}} \right)$$

fe(t): Viscosity eliminated arterial force

fmx: Maxima of viscosity eliminated arterial force

β: Stiffness index

D(t): Arterial diameter

Ds: Systolic diameter

Dd: Diastolic diameter

Results

The system captured high fidelity D and F waveforms, adequate for reliable β evaluation. Measured group-average β (4.7 ± 0.8) was concurrent with literature. The measured β values statistically agreed (LoA = ±0.83 and bias = −0.32; nonsignificant p > 0.05) and strongly correlated (r = 0.93, p < 0.001) with the reference values. Further, they exhibited acceptable beat-to-beat repeatability (variation <7%) and accuracy (RMSE = 0.53).

Conclusion

The proposed method demonstrated the functionality by estimating reliable carotid β. Its key advantage is the applicability to superficial arteries, especially from sites where direct pressure measurement is challenging. Further studies demonstrating its potential for clinical and research applications are underway.

References

  1. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, Hayoz D, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 2006;27:2588–605.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hayashi K, Handa H, Nagasawa S, Okumura A, Moritake K. Stiffness and elastic behavior of human intracranial and extracranial arteries. J Biomech 1980;13:175–84.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul Manoj.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manoj, R., Nabeel, P.M., Raj, K.V. et al. YI 2.5 Direct Measurement of Stiffness Index β of Superficial Arteries Without Blood Pressure Estimation. Artery Res 26 (Suppl 1), S18 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.201209.013

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.201209.013

Keywords