Skip to main content
  • Conference Abstract
  • Open access
  • Published:

P65 A Beat-to-Beat Quality Indicator Based on Piecewise Spatiotemporal Estimates of Carotid Pulse Wave Velocity Improves Correlation with Pulse Pressure

Abstract

Background

Local carotid pulse wave velocity (PWV) estimation is challenging due to a complex anatomy and associated wave reflections [1]. Wave interference is both blood pressure (BP) and position dependent, hence causing nonlinearity in the spatiotemporal PWV estimation [2]. In lack of beat-to-beat quality assessment [3], we propose a method to quantify this nonlinearity and thereby introduce a quality indicator (QI) for reliable PWV estimation.

Methodology

Carotid artery ultrasound (Vantage64, VerasonicsInc., USA) was acquired from 10 subjects (38 ± 10 years) in six repeated measurements. Simultaneously, ECG (ECG100C, BIOPACInc., USA) and noninvasive BP (NOVA, FinapresMedicalSystems B.V., NL) were recorded. Signals were processed into distension waveforms to extract systolic foot (SF) and dicrotic notch (DN) fiducials [4]. Beat-to-beat PWV estimates at SF (PWVSF) and DN (PWVDN) were obtained via spatiotemporal fitting of respective fiducial timings against transducer element distances. The proposed nonlinearity QI was quantified as standard deviation of the error between full-length PWV estimate and piecewise PWV estimates from the proximal, middle and distal subset of transducer elements. Linear regression was performed between independent pulse pressure (PP, in 2 [mmHg] intervals) and dependent PWV (means of all estimates) to validate QI according to Bramwell-Hill [5].

Results

When qualifying PWV estimates with QI ≤1 [m/s] we observed a significant R2 increase for both PWVSF (0.22 to 0.41, with decreased RMSE from 0.47 to 0.42 [m/s]) and PWVDN (0.21 to 0.53, although with constant RMSE of 0.32 [m/s]) as shown in annexed figure.

Conclusion

The proposed beat-to-beat QI accounts for significant variability in the PWV-PP relation, albeit at substantial data reduction. Therefore, the QI may facilitate real-time quality assessment towards reliable local PWV estimation. The unexplained variability remainder requires further investigations for confounding variables.

References

  1. Swillens A, Taelman L, Degroote J, Vierendeels J, Segers P. Comparison of non-invasive methods for measurement of local pulse wave velocity using FSI-simulations and in vivo data. Ann Biomed Eng 2013;41:1567–78.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hermeling E, Reesink KD, Reneman RS, Hoeks AP. Confluence of incident and reflected waves interferes with systolic foot detection of the carotid artery distension waveform. J Hypertens 2008;26:2374–80.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hermeling E, Reesink KD, Hoeks AP, Reneman RS. Potentials and pitfalls of local PWV measurements. Am J Hypertens [Internet] 2010;23:935.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beutel F, Mansilla Valle L, Van Hoof C, Hermeling E. End-diastolic wall position reset in long-term carotid artery motion tracking yields robust distension waveforms (Abstract Submitted to ARTERY19). 2019.

  5. Bramwell J, Hill A. The velocity of pulse wave in man. Proc R Soc Biol Sci 1922;93:298–306.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beutel, F., Chris, V.H. & Hermeling, E. P65 A Beat-to-Beat Quality Indicator Based on Piecewise Spatiotemporal Estimates of Carotid Pulse Wave Velocity Improves Correlation with Pulse Pressure. Artery Res 25 (Suppl 1), S108–S109 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.191224.096

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.191224.096