Skip to main content
  • ARTERY 18, Guimaraes Oral Presentation abstracts
  • Oral Session III - Clinical Aspects, Hypertension & Diabetes
  • Open access
  • Published:

3.4 A Clinical Score to Predict Elevated Arterial Stiffness: Derivation and Validation in 3,943 Hypertensive Patients

Abstract

Purpose/Background/Objectives

Aortic stiffness assessed by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) is an important predictor to gauge the overall risk of hypertensive patients; nonetheless, it is underutilized in everyday practice. We derived a simple scoring system based on clinical variables that can identify patients with a priority for measurement of PWV, i.e. those with elevated PWV (≥ 10 m/sec) and at higher risk for events.

Methods

Patient data from three outpatient clinics (n = 3,943) were used to form a derivation, internal and external validation cohort. For derivation, independent predictors of high PWV from a binary logistic regression model were dichotomized and implemented in a clinical prediction scoring system with the acronym SAGE (office systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg: 4 points, age ≥ 60 years: 4 points, glycemia [blood glucose ≥126 mg/dl]: 1 point, eGFR ≤60: 2 points).

Results

Its performance was validated at the internal and external validation cohorts with c-statistics being 0.781 (95% CI: 0.753–0.808) and 0.718 (95% CI: 0.682–0.755) respectively (Figure 1). A cut-off of 5 points to identify patients with high PWV in the external validation cohort yielded a positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity and specificity of 60.7%, 84.8%, 51.9% and 78.3% respectively.

Conclusions

The SAGE score that takes into account easily measured clinical variables (systolic blood pressure, age, glucose and eGFR) can be used to predict elevated levels of PWV and prioritize its measurement in specific patients. Its use will result in greater acknowledgement of the role of aortic stiffness and aid physicians in implementing it in clinical practice.

References

  1. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55 (13):1318–1327.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Shlomo Y, Spears M, Boustred C, May M, Anderson SG, Benjamin EJ, et al. Aortic pulse wave velocity improves cardiovascular event prediction: an individual participant meta-analysis of prospective observational data from 17,635 subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63 (7):636–646.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vlachopoulos C, Xaplanteris P, Aboyans V, Brodmann M, Cifkova R, Cosentino F, et al. The role of vascular biomarkers for primary and secondary prevention. A position paper from the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on peripheral circulation: Endorsed by the Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology (ARTERY) Society. Atherosclerosis 2015; 241 (2):507–532.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Reference Values for Arterial Stiffness C. Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: ’establishing normal and reference values’. Eur Heart J 2010; 31 (19):2338–2350.

    Google Scholar 

  5. McEniery CM, Spratt M, Munnery M, Yarnell J, Lowe GD, Rumley A, et al. An analysis of prospective risk factors for aortic stiffness in men: 20-year follow-up from the Caerphilly prospective study. Hypertension 2010; 56 (1):36–43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xaplanteris, P., Vlachopoulos, C., Protogerou, A. et al. 3.4 A Clinical Score to Predict Elevated Arterial Stiffness: Derivation and Validation in 3,943 Hypertensive Patients. Artery Res 24, 73 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.035

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.035