Skip to main content
  • Conference Abstract
  • Open access
  • Published:

YI 2.1 Pulse Wave Velocity Estimation from the Radial Pulse Waveform using Gaussian Process Regression: A Machine Learning Based Study

Abstract

Objective and Motivation

Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is known to be associated with vascular ageing, a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) [1]. The European gold standard measurement of PWV requires an experienced operator to measure pulse waveforms at multiple sites, sometimes together with an electrocardiogram [2,3]. This study aims to estimate PWV from the radial pulse waveform using machine learning.

Methods

Radial pulse waveforms and carotid-femoral PWVs were acquired in 3,082 unselected twins (https://twinsuk.ac.uk). 14 fiducial points on each pulse waveform were extracted using an in-house algorithm [4]. LASSO regression and principal component analysis (PCA) were used to identify the key features (timing and magnitude of the fiducial points) associated with PWV and exclude outliers. Finally, Gaussian process regression was used to estimate the PWV based on those key features only.

Results

Results show that PWV can be estimated from the radial pulse waveform only with an overall root mean squared error (RMSE) of 1.82 m/s (Figure A). Most of the measured PWV values were within the 95% confidence interval range of the estimated PWV. The difference between measured and estimated PWV values increased with the increasing PWV. PWV estimation on a subgroup of twins with a healthy range of blood pressure and PWV values [5] was achieved with a RMSE of 1.38 m/s (Figure B).

Conclusion

In this proof-of-concept study we have shown the possibility of estimating PWV from the radial pulse waveform using machine learning. This approach could make CVD detection more accessible to the wider population.

References

  1. Mattace-Raso FUS, Hofman A, Verwoert GC, Witteman JCM, Wilkinson I, Cockcroft J, et al. Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: ‘establishing normal and reference values’. Eur Heart J 2010;31:2338–50.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, Hayoz D, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 2006;27:2588–605.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Van Bortel LM, Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Chowienczyk P, Cruickshank JK, De Backer T, et al. Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens 2012;30:445–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Charlton PH, Harana JM, Vennin S, Li Y, Chowienczyk P, Alastruey J. Modeling arterial pulse waves in healthy aging: a database for in silico evaluation of haemodynamics and pulse wave indexes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2019;317:H1062–H85.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Díaz A, Galli C, Tringler M, Ramírez A, Cabrera Fischer EI. Reference values of pulse wave velocity in healthy people from an urban and rural argentinean population. Int J Hypertens 2014;2014:653239.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weiwei Jin.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, W., Chowienczyk, P. & Alastruey, J. YI 2.1 Pulse Wave Velocity Estimation from the Radial Pulse Waveform using Gaussian Process Regression: A Machine Learning Based Study. Artery Res 26 (Suppl 1), S12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.201209.009

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.201209.009

Keywords