Skip to main content
  • Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Effect of Body Habitus and Heart Rate on Accuracy of Aortic-Radial Transfer Functions for Predicting Central Hemodynamic Indices in Growing Children

Abstract

Central Systolic Blood Pressure (cSBP) and Central Augmentation Index (cAIx) have been independently associated with cardiovascular risk in adults, and can be estimated using a generalized peripheral-to-central transfer function. We hypothesize that transfer function accuracy and precision will be influenced by degree of growth and change in body habitus during periods of growth, such as in childhood. We studied the pulse pressure waveforms of 91 healthy children at 8-years of age, and subsequently at 14-years of age. Waveforms were obtained by high-fidelity applanation tonometry of the radial and carotid arteries. Individualized radial-to-carotid transfer functions were formulated at 8-years of age and applied at 14-years of age to estimate cSBP and cAIx. Accuracy was defined as the difference between directly measured and predicted values, and precision as the residuals. Changes in weight (vs. error: β = −0.22, p = 0.04; vs. residuals: β = 0.30; p < 0.01) and body mass index (vs. residuals: β = 0.28, p < 0.01), between 8 and 14 years of age were associated with accuracy and precision of individualized transfer functions in predicting cSBP at 14 years of age. Change in weight (vs. residuals: β = 0.30; p < 0.01) and heart rate (vs. residuals β = 0.32, p < 0.01) were associated with the precision in predicting cAIx. Changes in body habitus and heart rate over a 6-year period of growth are associated with the predictive accuracy and precision of individualized transfer functions in children suggestive of changes in the frequency response characteristics of an individual’s vascular system during growth periods.

References

  1. Vos T, Barber RM, Bell B, Bertozzi-Villa A, Biryukov S, Bolliger I, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015;386:743–800.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen X, Wang Y. Tracking of blood pressure from childhood to adulthood. Circulation 2008;117:3171–80.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Camhi SM, Katzmarzyk PT. Tracking of cardiometabolic risk factor clustering from childhood to adulthood Int J Pediatr Obes 2010;5:122–9.

  4. Juonala M, Cheung MMH, Sabin MA, Burgner D, Skilton MR, Kähönen M, et al. Effect of birth weight on life-course blood pressure levels among children born premature: the cardiovascular risk in Young Finns Study. J Hypertens 2015;33:1542–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zanetti D, Tikkanen E, Gustafsson S, Priest JR, Burgess S, Ingelsson E. Birthweight, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease: addressing the barker hypothesis with Mendelian randomization. Circ Genom Precis Med 2018;11:e002054.

  6. Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kizer JR, Lee ET, Galloway JM, Ali T, et al. Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does brachial pressure: the Strong Heart Study. Hypertension 2007;50:197–203.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kizer JR, Okin PM, Lee ET, Wang W, et al. High central pulse pressure is independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcome. The Strong Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1730–4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1318–27.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mitchell GF, Hwang SJ, Larson MG, Hamburg NM, Benjamin EJ, Vasan RS, et al. Transfer function-derived central pressure and cardiovascular disease events: the Framingham Heart Study. J Hypertens 2016;34:1528–34.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen CH, Nevo E, Fetics B, Pak PH, Yin FC, Maughan WL, et al. Estimation of central aortic pressure waveform by mathematical transformation of radial tonometry pressure: validation of generalized transfer function. Circulation 1997;95:1827–36.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hope SA, Tay DB, Meredith IT, Cameron JD. Use of arterial transfer functions for the derivation of aortic waveform characteristics. J Hypertens 2003;21:1299–305.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Segers P, Rietzschel E, Heireman S, De Buyzere M, Gillebert T, Verdonck P, et al. Carotid tonometry versus synthesized aorta pressure waves for the estimation of central systolic blood pressure and augmentation index. Am J Hypertens 2005;18:1168–73.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng HM, Chuang SY, Sung SH, Wu CC, Wang Jr J, Hsu PF, et al. 2019 Consensus of the Taiwan Hypertension Society and Taiwan Society of Cardiology on the clinical application of central blood pressure in the management of hypertension. Acta Cardiol Sin 2019;35:234–43.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang S, Zhou Z, Fan F, Qi L, Jia J, Sun P, et al. Joint effect of non-invasive central systolic blood pressure and peripheral systolic blood pressure on incident hypertension in a chinese community-based population. Sci Rep 2018;8:3229.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sharman JE, Marwick TH, Gilroy D, Otahal P, Abhayaratna WP, Stowasser M, et al. Randomized trial of guiding hypertension management using central aortic blood pressure compared with best-practice care. Hypertension 2013;62:1138–45.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hope SA, Meredith IT, Tay D, Cameron JD. ‘Generalizability’ of a radial-aortic transfer function for the derivation of central aortic waveform parameters. J Hypertens 2007;25:1812–20.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hahn JO. Individualized estimation of the central aortic blood pressure waveform: a comparative study. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2014;18:215–21.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mihrshahi S, Peat JK, Webb K, Tovey ER, Marks GB, Mellis CM, et al. The childhood asthma prevention study (CAPS): design and research protocol of a randomized trial for the primary prevention of asthma. Control Clin Trials 2001;22:333–54.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jones CR, Taylor K, Poston L, Shennan AH. Validation of the Welch Allyn ‘Vital Signs’ oscillometric blood pressure monitor. J Hum Hypertens 2001;15:191–5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pauca AL, O’Rourke MF, Kon ND. Prospective evaluation of a method for estimating ascending aortic pressure from the radial artery pressure waveform. Hypertension 2001;38:932–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sharman JE, Avolio AP, Baulmann J, Benetos A, Blacher J, Leigh Blizzard C, et al. Validation of non-invasive central blood pressure devices: ARTERY Society task force consensus statement on protocol standardization. Eur Heart J 2017;38:2805–12.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Karamanoglu M, O’Rourke MF, Avolio AP, Kelly RP. An analysis of the relationship between central aortic and peripheral upper limb pressure waves in man. Eur Heart J 1993;14:160–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Katz SH, Hediger ML, Schall JI, Bowers EJ, Barker WF, Aurand S, et al. Blood pressure, growth and maturation from childhood through adolescence. Mixed longitudinal analyses of the Philadelphia Blood Pressure Project. Hypertension 1980; 2:55–69.

  24. Sharman JE, Lim R, Qasem AM, Coombes JS, Burgess MI, Franco J, et al. Validation of a generalized transfer function to noninvasively derive central blood pressure during exercise. Hypertension 2006;47:1203–8.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mynard JP, Goldsmith G, Springall G, Eastaugh L, Lane GK, Zannino D, et al. Central aortic blood pressure estimation in children and adolescents: results of the KidCoreBP study. J Hypertens 2020;38:821–8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mynard J, Goldsmith G, Kowalski R, Eastaugh L, Lane G, Springall G, et al. Quantifying wave reflection in children: invasive vs non-invasive central augmentation index and reflection magnitude and their association with left ventricular mass. Artery Res 2018;24:92.

    Google Scholar 

  27. American National Standard. Non-invasive Sphygmomanometers - Part 2: clinical validation of automated measurement type. ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2009. Arlington, Virginia: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation; 2009.

  28. Cai TY, Qasem A, Ayer JG, Butlin M, Meagher SO, Melki C, et al. Central blood pressure in children and adolescents: non-invasive development and testing of novel transfer functions. J Hum Hypertens 2017;31:831–7.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hidvégi EV, Illyés M, Molnár FT, Cziráki A. Influence of body height on aortic systolic pressure augmentation and wave reflection in childhood. J Hum Hypertens 2014;29:495–501.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Elmenhorst J, Hulpke-Wette M, Barta C, Pozza RD, Springer S, Oberhoffer R. Percentiles for central blood pressure and pulse wave velocity in children and adolescents recorded with an oscillometric device. Atherosclerosis 2015;238:9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Diaz A, Zócalo Y, Bia D, Fischer ED. Reference intervals of central aortic blood pressure and augmentation index assessed with an oscillometric device in healthy children, adolescents, and young adults from Argentina. Int J Hypertens 2018;2018:1469651.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kahn FK, Wake M, Lycett K, Clifford S, Burgner DP, Goldsmith G, et al. Vascular function and stiffness: population epidemiology and concordance in Australian children aged 11–12 years and their parents. BMJ Open 2019;9:34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Litwin M, Obrycki Ł, Niemirska A, Sarnecki J, Kułaga Z. Central systolic blood pressure and central pulse pressure predict left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive children. Pediatr Nephrol 2019;34:703–12.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Alves C, Pinho JF, dos Santos LM, Magalhães G, da Silva JM, Fontes FL, et al. Augmentation index, a predictor of cardiovascular events, is increased in children and adolescents with primary nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol 2020;35:815–27.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Faconti L, Silva MJ, Molaodi OR, Enayat ZE, Cassidy A, Karamanos A, et al. Can arterial wave augmentation in young adults help account for variability of cardiovascular risk in different British ethnic groups? J Hypertens 2016;34:2220–6.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael R. Skilton.

Additional information

Peer review under responsibility of the Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology

Data availability statement: Participant raw waveform data used in this study may be available on reasonable request to the authors.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, T.Y., Qasem, A., Butlin, M. et al. Effect of Body Habitus and Heart Rate on Accuracy of Aortic-Radial Transfer Functions for Predicting Central Hemodynamic Indices in Growing Children. Artery Res 26, 242–249 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.201003.001

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.201003.001

Keywords