Skip to main content
  • Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Relationship between Obesity Phenotypes and Cardiovascular Risk in a Chinese Cohort

Abstract

Objective

The changing living patterns in China are accompanied by an increase in prevalence of cardiovascular disease for which obesity is a significant factor. This study investigated the association between obesity phenotypes and risk of cardiovascular disease in a Chinese cohort.

Methods

A sample of 10,826 community-dwelling individuals aged 40–79 years (mean age 62.2 ± 12.0 years) were stratified by categories of body mass index (BMI) (normal weight: BMI < 24 kg/m2; overweight: BMI of 25–28 kg/m2; obese: BMI > 28 kg/m2) and metabolic status and divided into six phenotypes: (1) normal metabolic status and normal weight; (2) normal metabolic status and overweight; (3) normal metabolic status and obese; (4) normal weight and dysmetabolic status; (5) dysmetabolic status and overweight; (6) dysmetabolic status and obese. The Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk score was determined based on cardiovascular risk factors.

Results

Prevalence of overweight and obesity was 15.2% and 25.2% respectively. After adjusting for confounding factors, ASCVD score was significantly higher in men [Odds Ratio (OR): 9.796, 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.833–16.450; p < 0.001] and women [OR: 5.821, 95% CI: 4.253–7.968; p < 0.001] with obese and dysmetabolic status compared to normal. The odds of reporting ASCVD risk was significantly higher in men (OR: 3.432, 95% CI: 1.965–5.996; p < 0.001) and women (OR: 4.647, 95% CI: 3.327–6.491; p < 0.001) with obese and dysmetabolic status compared to those with obese and normal metabolic status. In addition, the odds of reporting ASCVD risk was significantly lower in men (OR: 0.317, 95% CI: 0.142–0.707; p = 0.005) and women (OR: 0.487, 95% CI: 0.320–0.739; p = 0.001) with the overweight–dysmetabolic status phenotype compared to those with an overweight–normal metabolic phenotype.

Conclusion

Obese dysmetabolic individuals had the highest ASCVD risk score in all phenotypes. When BMI category was overweight, BMI played a more important role than metabolic status, whereas when BMI category was obesity, risk was more affected by metabolic status.

Highlights

What is already known about this subject?

  • Obesity presents a major risk for cardiovascular disease.

  • Some studies provide evidence that obesity has better outcome compared to lean counterparts.

What does this study add?

  • This study provides information that obese dysmetabolic individuals show the highest Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk score in all phenotypes in the whole cohort.

  • This study also indicates that body mass index (BMI) plays a more important role for estimation of CV risk than metabolic status in overweight, whereas risk is more affected by metabolic status in obesity.

References

  1. Stevens J, Truesdale KP, Katz EG, Cai J. Impact of body mass index on incident hypertension and diabetes in Chinese Asians, American Whites, and American Blacks: the People’s Republic of China Study and the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:1365–74.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2014;384:766–81.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jordan J, Toplak H, Grassi G, Yumuk V, Kotsis V, Engeli S, et al. Joint statement of the European Association for the Study of Obesity and the European Society of Hypertension: obesity and heart failure. J Hypertens 2016;34:1678–88.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Poirier P, Giles TD, Bray GA, Hong Y, Stern JS, Pi-Sunyer FX, et al. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: pathophysiology, evaluation, and effect of weight loss. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2006;26:968–76.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Holroyd EW, Sirker A, Kwok CS, Kontopantelis E, Ludman PF, De Belder MA, et al. The relationship of body mass index to percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes: does the obesity paradox exist in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention cohorts? Insights from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:1283–92.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wassertheil-Smoller S, Fann C, Allman RM, Black HR, Camel GH, Davis B, et al. Relation of low body mass to death and stroke in the systolic hypertension in the elderly program. The SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:494–500.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jerant A, Franks P. Body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, and short-term mortality: a population-based observational study, 2000–2006. J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25:422–31.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pokharel Y, Sun W, Virani SS, Nambi V, Hoogeveen RC, Chang PP, et al. Myocardial injury, obesity, and the obesity paradox: the ARIC Study. JACC Heart Fail 2017;5:56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Uretsky S, Messerli FH, Bangalore S, Champion A, Cooper-Dehoff RM, Zhou Q, et al. Obesity paradox in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease. Am J Med 2007;120:863–70.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grundy SM. Metabolic syndrome: therapeutic considerations. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2005;170:107–33.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lu J, Wang L, Li M, Xu Y, Jiang Y, Wang W, et al. Metabolic syndrome among adults in China: the 2010 China noncommunicable disease surveillance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017;102:507–15.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eckel RH, Jakicic JM, Ard JD, de Jesus JM, Houston Miller N, Hubbard VS, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:2960–84.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goff DC, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, Coady S, D’Agostino RB, Gibbons R, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:2935–59.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greene T, Bourgoignie JJ, Habwe V, Kusek JW, Snetselaar LG, Soucie JM, et al. Baseline characteristics in the modification of diet in Renal Disease Study. J Am Soc Nephrol 1993;4:1221–36.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou BF, Cooperative Meta-Analysis Group of the Working Group on Obesity in China. Predictive values of body mass index and waist circumference for risk factors of certain related diseases in Chinese adults—study on optimal cut-off points of body mass index and waist circumference in Chinese adults. Biomed Environ Sci 2002;15:83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation 2009;120:1640–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jee SH, Jo J. Linkage of epidemiologic evidence with the clinical aspects of metabolic syndrome. Korean Circ J 2012;42:371–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Katz EG, Stevens J, Truesdale KP, Cai J, North KE, Steffen LM. Associations of body mass index with incident hypertension in American white, American black and Chinese Asian adults in early and middle adulthood: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) study. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2013;22:626–34.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yun JE, Won S, Sung J, Jee SH. Impact of metabolic syndrome independent of insulin resistance on the development of cardiovascular disease. Circ J 2012;76:2443–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Aronson D, Rayfield EJ. How hyperglycemia promotes atherosclerosis: molecular mechanisms. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2002;1:1.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wu S, Yang YM, Zhu J, Wan HB, Wang J, Zhang H, et al. Impact of age on the association between body mass index and all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Nutr Health Aging 2017;21:1125–32.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cheng FW, Gao X, Mitchell DC, Wood C, Rolston DD, Still CD, et al. Metabolic health status and the obesity paradox in older adults. J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr 2016;35:161–76.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bucholz EM, Beckman AL, Krumholz HA, Krumholz HM; Dr. Bucholz was affiliated with the Yale School of Medicine and Yale School of Public Health during the time that the work was conducted. Excess weight and life expectancy after acute myocardial infarction: the obesity paradox reexamined. Am Heart J 2016;172:173–81.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fahs CA, Smith DL, Horn GP, Agiovlasitis S, Rossow LM, Echols G, et al. Impact of excess body weight on arterial structure, function, and blood pressure in firefighters. Am J Cardiol 2009;104:1441–5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Khawaja KI, Mian SA, Fatima A, Tahir GM, Khan FF, Burney S, et al. Phenotypic and metabolic dichotomy in obesity: clinical, biochemical and immunological correlates of metabolically divergent obese phenotypes in healthy South Asian adults. Singapore Med J 2018;59:431–8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Oh SK, Cho AR, Kwon YJ, Lee HS, Lee JW. Derivation and validation of a new visceral adiposity index for predicting visceral obesity and cardiometabolic risk in a Korean population. PLoS One 2018;13:e0203787.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li K, Ochoa E, Lipsey T, Nelson T. Correlates of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in older Colorado firefighters. Occup Med 2018;68:51–5.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pichler G, Martinez F, Vicente A, Solaz E, Calaforra O, Lurbe E, et al. Influence of obesity in central blood pressure. J Hypertens 2015;33:308–13.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang N, Shao H, Chen Y, Xia F, Chi C, Li Q, et al. Follicle-stimulating hormone, its association with cardiometabolic risk factors, and 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6:pii: e005918.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ancheta IB, Battie CA, Volgman AS, Ancheta CV, Palaniappan L. Cardiovascular disease risk score: results from the Filipino-American women Cardiovascular Study. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2017;4:25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fan H, Li X, Zheng L, Chen X, Lan Q, Wu H, et al. Abdominal obesity is strongly associated with cardiovascular disease and its risk factors in elderly and very elderly community-dwelling Chinese. Sci Rep 2016;6:21521.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yang X, Gu D. Response by Yang and Gu to Letter Regarding Article, “Predicting the 10-Year Risks of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Chinese Population: The China-PAR Project (Prediction for ASCVD Risk in China)”. Circulation 2017;135:e822–e3.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hu Y, Zheng S, Zhao J, Deng X, Tan I, Butlin M, et al. The relationship between obesity phenotypes and cardiovascular risk in a Chinese cohort. The Pulse of Asia (Basel), Shanghai, China: Pulse; 2019, p. 40.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junli Zuo.

Additional information

Peer review under responsibility of the Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology

Data availability statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Junli Zuo, upon reasonable request.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, Y., Zheng, S., Zhao, J. et al. Relationship between Obesity Phenotypes and Cardiovascular Risk in a Chinese Cohort. Artery Res 26, 34–41 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.200306.001

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.200306.001

Keywords