Skip to main content
  • Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Validation of a Method to Estimate Stroke Volume from Brachial-cuff Derived Pressure Waveforms

Abstract

Background

Steady state hemodynamics [Stroke Volume - SV, cardiac output, peripheral resistance (Rp)] have attracted researchers in hypertension for decades. However, due to technical difficulties, they never entered clinical medicine.

Objective

To investigate the performance of a model-based algorithm, utilizing brachial pressure waveforms obtained with a cuff, to estimate stroke volume. The model combines a modified three-element like Windkessel system and transmission line theory.

Participants and Methods

In study 1, 97 patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction and two healthy controls underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (1.5 Tesla Magnetom, Siemens, Germany), and SV was measured with standard protocols from short axis cine images (11 slices). In study 2, 19 healthy individuals (12 females) had SVs measured with inert gas rebreathing at rest, and during light exercise (20 watts) on a bicycle ergometer. In both studies, model-based SV, estimated with a brachial cuff, was the comparator.

Results

In study 1, both SVs were moderately correlated (r = 0.54, p < 0.001). Using the method of Bland–Altman, mean difference between both methods was 8.7 ml (1.96 limits of agreement were 36.7 and –19.3 ml), with no systematic bias. In study 2, both SVs were moderately correlated at rest (r = 0.63, p = 0.004) and at light exercise (r = 0.70, p = 0.0057). Using the method of Bland-Altman, mean difference between both methods was 8.6 ml (1.96 limits of agreement were 39.2 and –22.0 ml) at rest, and 42.7 ml (1.96 limits of agreement were 95.4 and –10.1 ml) at light exercise.

Conclusion

Brachial oscillometry and mathematical modeling provide a reasonable estimate of SV under static conditions, which may be a useful addition to 24-h measurements of blood pressure and pulsatile hemodynamics.

References

  1. Eich RH, Cuddy RP, Smulyan H, Lyons RH. Hemodynamics in labile hypertension: a follow-up study. Circulation 1966;34: 299–307.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Townsend RR, Wilkinson IB, Schiffrin EL, Avolio AP, Chirinos JA, Cockcroft JR, et al. Recommendations for improving and standardizing vascular research on arterial stiffness: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension 2015;66:698–722.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Middlemiss JE, Cocks A, Paapstel K, Maki-Petaja KM, Sunita, Wilkinson IB, et al. Evaluation of inert gas rebreathing for determination of cardiac output: influence of age, gender and body size. Hypertens Res 2019;42:834–44.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mahajan S, Gu J, Lu Y, Khera R, Spatz ES, Zhang M, et al. Hemodynamic phenotypes of hypertension based on cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance. Am J Med 2019 (in press).

  5. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. 2018 Practice Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension: ESC/ESH Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension. J Hypertens 2018;36:2284–309.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weber T, Wassertheurer S, Rammer M, Maurer E, Hametner B, Mayer CC, et al. Validation of a brachial cuff-based method for estimating central systolic blood pressure. Hypertension 2011; 58:825–32.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Papaioannou TG, Karageorgopoulou TD, Sergentanis TN, Protogerou AD, Psaltopoulou T, Sharman JE, et al. Accuracy of commercial devices and methods for noninvasive estimation of aortic systolic blood pressure a systematic review and meta-analysis of invasive validation studies. J Hypertens 2016; 34:1237–48.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thiele RH, Bartels K, Gan TJ. Cardiac output monitoring: a contemporary assessment and review. Crit Care Med 2015;43:177–85.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Franssen PM, Imholz BP. Evaluation of the Mobil-O-Graph new generation ABPM device using the ESH criteria. Blood Press Monit 2010;15:229–31.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hametner B, Wassertheurer S, Kropf J, Mayer C, Holzinger A, Eber B, et al. Wave reflection quantification based on pressure waveforms alone—methods, comparison, and clinical covariates. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2013;109:250–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schwaiger JP, Reinstadler SJ, Tiller C, Holzknecht M, Reindl M, Mayr A, et al. Baseline LV ejection fraction by cardiac magnetic resonance and 2D echocardiography after ST-elevation myocardial infarction — influence of infarct location and prognostic impact. Eur Radiol 2020;30:663–71.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clemensen P, Christensen P, Norsk P, Gronlund J. A modified photo- and magnetoacoustic multigas analyzer applied in gas exchange measurements. J Appl Physiol 1994;76:2832–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peyton PJ, Thompson B. Agreement of an inert gas rebreathing device with thermodilution and the direct oxygen Fick method in measurement of pulmonary blood flow. J Clin Monit Comput 2004;18:373–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feistritzer HJ, Klug G, Reinstadler SJ, Reindl M, Mayr A, Schocke M, et al. Oscillometric analysis compared with cardiac magnetic resonance for the assessment of aortic pulse wave velocity in patients with myocardial infarction. J Hypertens 2016;34:1746–51.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Papaioannou TG, Xanthis D, Argyris A, Vernikos P, Mastakoura G, Samara S, et al. Accuracy and precision of cardiac output estimation by an automated, brachial cuff-based oscillometric device in patients with shock. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2019 [Epub ahead of print].

  17. Messerli FH, Ventura HO, Reisin E, Dreslinski GR, Dunn FG, MacPhee AA, et al. Borderline hypertension and obesity: two prehypertensive states with elevated cardiac output. Circulation 1982;66:55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  18. McEniery CM, Yasmin, Wallace S, Maki-Petaja K, McDonnell B, Sharman JE, et al. Increased stroke volume and aortic stiffness contribute to isolated systolic hypertension in young adults. Hypertens 2005;46:221–6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Middlemiss JE, Miles KL, McDonnell BJ, Yasmin, Maki-Petaja KM, Cockcroft JR, et al. Mechanisms underlying elevated SBP differ with adiposity in young adults: the Enigma study. J Hypertens 2016;34:290–7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Greve AM, Olsen MH, Bella JN, Lønnebakken MT, Gerdts E, Okin PM, et al. Contrasting hemodynamic mechanisms of losartan-vs. atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment: a LIFE study. Am J Hypertens 2012;25:1017–23.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ewen S, Cremers B, Meyer MR, Donazzan L, Kindermann I, Ukena C, et al. Blood pressure changes after catheter-based renal denervation are related to reductions in total peripheral resistance. J Hypertens 2015;33:2519–25.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vella CA, Robergs RA. A review of the stroke volume response to upright exercise in healthy subjects. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39:190–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Weber.

Additional information

Peer review under responsibility of the Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology

Data availability statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Thomas Weber, upon reasonable request.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weber, T., Wassertheurer, S., Middlemiss, J. et al. Validation of a Method to Estimate Stroke Volume from Brachial-cuff Derived Pressure Waveforms. Artery Res 26, 42–47 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.200223.001

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.200223.001

Keywords