Skip to main content
  • ARTERY 18 Poster Session
  • Poster Session II - Other
  • Open access
  • Published:

P165 Evaluating Carotid Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Measured by Cuff-Based Approach Against the Tonometry-Based Reference Standard in a Paediatric Population

Abstract

Background

Carotid femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) is directly associated with arterial stiffness in major elastic arteries and predicts future cardiovascular events (1). Little is known of cfPWV as a marker of vascular health in children. Semi-automated cuff-based devices for assessing cfPWV are increasingly popular, although these utilize an algorithm developed and validated in adults (2). Physiological differences between adults and children may thus reduce the accuracy of cuff-based.

Methods

We sought to determine the accuracy of a cuff-based cfPWV device in healthy children and determine whether an age-appropriate algorithm increases accuracy. Methods we prospectively recruited 29 healthy children (mean age = 11.5 ± 5.2 years old). cfPWV was measured using a tonometer on the carotid artery and an inflated cuff on the thigh (Sphygmocor XCEL; AtCor Medical, Australia), and using a tonometer on both the carotid artery and femoral artery (SphygmoCor CvMS; AtCor Medical, Australia) as a reference method. We assessed the accuracy of the cuff-based device with its standard algorithm that was developed in adults, and an adjusted algorithm corrected for physiological differences in leg (femoral to thigh cuff) PWV between adult and children (3).

Results

Cuff-based device estimates of cfPWV in children had excellent agreement to the reference standard (r = 0.85; Δ = −0.26 ms−1 [SD 0.44]). The adjusted algorithm improved the accuracy of the cuff-based method (r = 0.84; Δ = 0.02 ms−1 [SD 0.44]) (Figure 1).

Conclusions

Although the cuff-based semi-automatic approach estimates cfPWV with excellent agreement to the reference standard, adjusting the algorithm for known differences in leg PWV improves the accuracy of cuff-based measurement in children.

Bland-Altman analysis of a cuff-based pulse wave velocity device versus a reference tonometry-based pulse wave velocity device. Above – standard algorithm; Below – adjusted algorithm; Left – dashed line represents line of best fit; Right – dashed line represents the mean difference, dotted line represents ±0.5ms−1

References

  1. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, Hayoz D, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(21):2588–605.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Butlin M, Qasem A, Battista F, Bozec E, McEniery CM, Millet-Amaury E, et al. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity assessment using novel cuff-based techniques: comparison with tonometric measurement. J Hypertens. 2013;31(11):2237–43.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Avolio AP, Chen SG, Wang RP, Zhang CL, Li MF, O’Rourke MF. Effects of aging on changing arterial compliance and left ventricular load in a northern Chinese urban community. Circulation. 1983;68(1):50–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, T., Meroni, A., Dissanayake, H. et al. P165 Evaluating Carotid Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Measured by Cuff-Based Approach Against the Tonometry-Based Reference Standard in a Paediatric Population. Artery Res 24, 128 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.218

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.218