- ARTERY 18 Poster Session
- Poster Session II - Models, Methodologies and Imaging Technology II
- Open access
- Published:
P138 Influence of Ultrasound Settings on Carotid Biomarker Assessment by B-Mode Image Processing
Artery Research volume 24, page 119 (2018)
Abstract
Purpose/Background/Objectives
This study aims to investigate how image settings affect carotid Intima-Media-Thickness (IMT) and diameter estimation performed with CarotidStudio (Quipu Srl).
Methods
14 healthy volunteers (24.4 ± 4.4 years; 8 men) were recruited. Longitudinal scans 3cm deep of common-carotid-arteries with the same region-of-interest were obtained by expert operator, starting from a “default” setup (central Time Gain Compensation-TGC; gain:50 dB; no persistence filter) and adjusting one parameter at a time (oblique TGC; gain:10 dB increments from 30 to 70 dB; persistence filter). The acquisition was performed twice and repeatability was expressed for each setup as coefficient of variation (CV). Significant changes (p < 0.05) with respect to the “default” setup were analysed by paired Student-t-test.
Results
A 70 dB gain results in overestimating IMT (from 0.46 mm ± 0.01 mm to 0.54 mm ± 0.01 mm), underestimating diameter (from 6.04 mm ± 0.04 mm to 5.70 mm ± 0.23 mm), increasing their CVs (from 2.14% ± 1.92% to 6.85% ± 5.23% for IMT, from 1.79% ± 1.22% to 4.77% ± 4.71% for diameter) and in 4/14 cases the estimation wasn’t possible. Distension CV increases also with 60 dB (from 5.71% ± 4.31% to 10.84% ± 5.91% and to 12.59% ± 7.97%). Persistence and TGC do not affect repeatability, whereas diameter (5.96 mm ± 0.03 mm) and distension (from 0.82 mm ± 0.02 mm to 0.66 mm ± 0.02 mm) values are influenced by persistence.
Conclusions
CarotidStudio precision does not show significant alterations except from 70 dB gain, which, due to the image grey-level saturation, results in poor image quality and modified values. Persistence does not affect precision but leads to reduced diameter and distension, possibly for the intrinsic behaviour of mathematical operator and image temporal filtering. Gain and persistence influence ultrasound biomarker estimation; the chosen setup should be documented and replicated in follow-up scans.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Francesconi, M., Gemignani, V., Gherardini, R. et al. P138 Influence of Ultrasound Settings on Carotid Biomarker Assessment by B-Mode Image Processing. Artery Res 24, 119 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.191
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.191