Skip to main content
  • Short communication
  • Open access
  • Published:

Does the acute hemodynamic response to a maximum running exercise depend on the aerobic training status of the subjects?

Abstract

Background

High-intensity training has become increasingly popular in recent years but the exact effects of high intensity running on the hemodynamic system are not entirely understood and it is unknown whether the aerobic training status of the subjects might influence these hemodynamic reactions. Therefore, the study aims to evaluate whether the acute reactions of peripheral and central blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness (AS) to a maximal running exercise depend the training status of the subjects.

Methods

41 healthy subjects were recruited. Of these were 21 aerobically trained (AE; 11 men) and 20 untrained (UN; 10 men). Aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV), peripheral and central BP was measured at rest and immediately after a maximal treadmill exercise using a ramp protocol including spirometric measurements.

Results

Resting hemodynamic values were not different between the groups. Systolic central and peripheral BP, and PWV increased in both groups in response to the running exercise. Δ of all measured parameters showed no difference between the groups.

Conclusions

The acute increases of AS and BP to a maximal running regimen seem to be independent of the subjects’ training status and might therefore be an eligible training mode to maintain overall and vascular health.

References

  1. Artinian NT, Fletcher GF, Mozaffarian D, Kris-Etherton P, van Horn L, Lichtenstein AH, etal. Interventionsto promote physical activity and dietary lifestyle changes for cardiovascular risk factor reduction in adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010;122:406–41.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Santos-Parker JR, LaRocca TJ, Seals DR. Aerobic exercise and other healthy lifestyle factors that influence vascular aging. Adv Physiol Educ 2014;38:296–307.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Helgerud J, Høydal K, Wang E, Karlsen T, Berg P, Bjerkaas M, et al. Aerobic high-intensity intervals improve VO2max more than moderate training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007;39:665–71.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rognmo Ø, Hetland E, Helgerud J, Hoff J, Slørdahl SA. High intensity aerobic interval exerciseis superior to moderate intensity exercise for increasing aerobic capacity in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2004;11:216–22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ciolac EG, Bocchi EA, Bortolotto LA, Carvalho VO, Greve JM, Guimarães GV. Effects of high-intensity aerobic interval training vs. moderate exercise on hemodynamic, metabolic and neuro-humoral abnormalities of young normotensive women at high familial risk for hypertension. Hypertens Res 2010;33:836–43.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Milatz F, Ketelhut S, Ketelhut RG. Favorable effect of aerobic exercise on arterial pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity during stress testing. Vasa 2015;44:271–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tomschi F, Köster P, Predel H-G, Lay D, Bloch W, Grau M. Acute effects of lower and upper body-resistance training on arterial stiffness, peripheral, and central blood pressure in young normotensive women. Sport Sci Health 2018;31:1925.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tomschi F, Bizjak DA, Predel H-G, Bloch W, Grau M. Lactate distribution in red blood cells and plasma after a high intensity running exercise in aerobically trained and untrained subjects. J Hum Sport Exerc 2018;13. in press.

  9. Franssen PML, Imholz BPM. Evaluation of the Mobil-O-Graph new generation ABPM device using the ESH criteria. Blood Pres Monit 2010;15:229–31.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weiss W, Gohlisch C, Harsch-Gladisch C, Tölle M, Zidek W, van der Giet M. Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device. Blood Pres Monit 2012;17:128–31.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hametner B, Wassertheurer S, Kropf J, Mayer C, Eber B, Weber T. Oscillometric estimation of aortic pulse wave velocity: comparison with intra-aortic catheter measurements. Blood Pres Monit 2013;18:173–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ashor AW, Lara J, Siervo M, Celis-Morales C, Mathers JC. Effects of exercise modalities on arterial stiffness and wave reflection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2014;9:e110034.

  13. Cheung Y-F. Arterial stiffness in the young: assessment, determinants, and implications. Korean Circ J 2010;40:153–62.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Müller J, Wilms M, Oberhoffer R. Acute effects of submaximal endurance training on arterial stiffness in healthy middle- and long-distance runners. J Clin Hypertens 2015;17:371–4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schroeder EC, Ranadive SM, Heffernan KS, Jae SY, Fernhall B. The acute effect of maximal aerobic and isometric exercise on arterial stiffness parameters in boys and men. Artery Res 2017; 19:24–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nitzsche N, Weigert M, Baumgärtel L, Auerbach T, Schuffenhauer D, Nitzsche R, et al. Acute effects of different strength training protocols on arterial stiffness in healthy subjects. Int J Sports Sci 2016;6:195–202.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabian Tomschi.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license. https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tomschi, F., Ottmann, H., Latsch, J. et al. Does the acute hemodynamic response to a maximum running exercise depend on the aerobic training status of the subjects?. Artery Res 23, 28–31 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2018.05.007

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2018.05.007

Keywords