Skip to main content
  • Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Abdominal aortic size and volume by computed tomography angiography in population of Ukraine: Normal values by age, gender, and body surface area

Abstract

Background

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is a standard tool for investigation of the abdominal aorta diseases. Currently, there are only a few published scientific articles devoted to the study of the infrarenal aortic size without pathology. The aim of the current work was to examine the indicators of size and volume of the infrarenal aorta and investigate their dependence on the body surface area, body mass index (BMI) and age in patients without aortic diseases.

Methods

We analyzed 94 patients without the diseases of the abdominal cavity, who underwent computed tomography angiography. There were 36 men (38,3%), the average age of the participants was 52,9 ± 15,4 years. All patients underwent CTA of the aorta with contrast-enhanced arterial phase.

Results

In 94 patients the average diameter of the IA was 18,2 ± 2,7 mm, volume — 21,0 ± 6,65 cm3, and length — 96,6 ± 10,6 mm. This study uncovered a significant strong correlation between the body surface area and the diameter/volume of the IA aorta. There was no relationship between the length of the aorta, and anthropometric data.

Conclusions

We discovered a significant strong correlation between age, body surface area with the diameter and volume of the aorta. In all cases, there was no relationship between the length of the aorta, and anthropometric data. There was a significant difference in infrarenal aorta diameter and volume between men and women. The significant positive correlation between the body surface area, BMI and the diameter/volume of the IA was detected only in women.

References

  1. Wolak Arik, Gransar Heidi, Thomson Louise EJ, Friedman John D, Rory Hachamovitch, Ariel Gutstein, et al. Aortic size assessment by noncontrast cardiac computed tomography: normal limits by age, gender, and body surface area. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2008; 1(2):200–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.11.005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rogers IS, Massaro JM, Truong QA, Mahabadi AA, Kriegel MF, Fox CS, et al. Distribution, determinants, and normal reference values of thoracic and abdominal aortic diameters by computed tomography (from the Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol 2013 May 15;111(10):1510–1516, http://dx.doi.org//. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.01.306.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lee JT, Aziz IN, Lee JT, Haukoos JS, Donayre CE, Walot I, et al. Volume regression of abdominal aortic aneurysms and its relation to successful endoluminal exclusion. J Vasc Surg 2003 Dec;38(6):1254–63. PubMed PMID: 14681624.

  4. Hendy K, Gunnarsson R, Cronin O, Golledge J. Infrarenal abdominal aortic calcification volume does not predict small abdominal aortic aneurysm growth. Atherosclerosis 2015 Nov; 243(1):334–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.07.027. Epub 2015 Jul 16. PubMed PMID: 26433350.

  5. Parr A, Jayaratne C, Buttner P, Golledge J. Comparison of volume and diameter measurement in assessing small abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion examined using computed tomographic angiography. Eur J Radiol 2011 Jul;79(1):42–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.12.018. Epub 2010 Jan 12. PubMed PMID: 20061105.

  6. Jasper A, Harshe G, Keshava SN, Kulkarni G, Stephen E, Agarwal S. Evaluation of normal abdominal aortic diameters in the Indian population using computed tomography. J Postgrad Med 2014 Jan-Mar;60(1):57–60. https://doi.org/10.4103/0022-3859.128813.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Norman PE, Muller J, Golledge J. The cardiovascular and prognostic significance of the infrarenal aortic diameter. J Vasc Surg 2011;54:1817–20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cronin O, Liu D, Bradshaw B, Iyer V, Buttner P, Cunningham M, et al. Visceral adiposity is not associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm presence and growth. Vasc Med 2014 Jun 19;19(4): 272–80 [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 24948557.

  9. Daimon M, Watanabe H, Abe Y, Hirata K, Hozumi T, Ishii K, et al., JAMP Study Investigators. Normal values of echocardiographic parameters in relation to age in a healthy Japanese population: the JAMP study. Circ J 2008;72:1859–66.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis AE, Lewandowski AJ, Holloway CJ, Ntusi NA, Banerjee R, Nethononda R, et al. Observational study of regional aortic size referenced to body size: production of a cardiovascular magnetic resonance nomogram. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2014 Jan 21;16:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-16-9. PubMed PMID: 24447690; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3899403.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andriy Nykonenko.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nykonenko, A., Balyuta, A., Haidarzhi, Y. et al. Abdominal aortic size and volume by computed tomography angiography in population of Ukraine: Normal values by age, gender, and body surface area. Artery Res 20, 22–26 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.197

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.197

Keywords