Skip to main content
  • Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Estimation of maximal oxygen consumption and heart rate recovery using the Tecumseh sub-maximal step test and their relationship to cardiovascular risk factors

Abstract

Background

Maximum aerobic capacity (VO2max) is associated with lower cardiovascular and total mortality. Step tests can be used to provide an estimate of (VO2max) in epidemiological or home-based studies. We compared different methods of estimation of VO2-max and heart rate recovery and evaluated the relationship of these estimates with cardiovascular risk factors.

Methods

Data were analysed from 2286 participants in the Tecumseh Community Health Study (>16 y and <70 y) who performed a step test. VO2max was estimated from heart rate using three methods and the results compared. The magnitude of heart rate recovery (HRR) and the time constant of recovery based on different time intervals post-exercise were also estimated.

Results

Estimated VO2max showed good or poor agreement depending on the method used. VO2max correlated inversely with systolic blood pressure (SBP), body mass index (BMI), total cholesterol, blood glucose following a 100 g oral load (PLG) and Framingham risk score. In a multivariable model age sex, cigarette smoking, SBP, BMI and PLG were significantly inversely associated with VO2max. Correlations with risk factors were strongest for HRR measured over the first 30 s of recovery. Only the time constant calculated from the 3 min post-exercise period correlated significantly with risk factors.

Conclusions

The Tecumseh step test can be used to provide estimates of VO2max and heart rate recovery. Estimated VO2max was inversely associated with higher systolic BP, higher BMI and worse glucose tolerance. Measurements of HRR over the first 30 s and the time constant calculate from the first 3 min of recovery correlate most closely with risk factors.

References

  1. Blair SN, Kohl 3rd HW, Paffenbarger Jr RS, Clark DG, Cooper KH, Gibbons LW. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality. A prospective study of healthy men and women. JAMA 1989;262:2395–401.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American College of Sports Medicine, Thompson WR, Gordon NF, Pescatello LS. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.

  3. Marley WP, Linnerud AC. Astrand-Ryhming step test norms for college students. Br J Sports Med 1976;10:76–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Druskins LM, Smith JL. The use of step tests for physical work capacity evaluation. In: Aghazadeh F, editor. Advances in industrial ergonomics and safety VI. London, UK: Taylor & Francis; 1994. p. 29–36.

  5. Astrand I. Aerobic work capacity in men and women with special reference to age. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl 1960;49:1–92.

    Google Scholar 

  6. von Dobeln W, Astrand I, Bergstrom A. An analysis of age and other factors related to maximal oxygen uptake. J Appl Physiol 1967;22:934–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buckley JP, Sim J, Eston RG, Hession R, Fox R. Reliability and validity of measures taken during the Chester step test to predict aerobic power and to prescribe aerobic exercise. Br J Sports Med 2004;38:197–205.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McArdle WD, Katch FI, Pechar GS, Jacobson L, Ruck S. Reliability and interrelationships between maximal oxygen intake, physical work capacity and step-test scores in college women. Med Sci Sports 1972;4:182–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Siconolfi SF, Garber CE, Lasater TM, Carleton RA. A simple, valid step test for estimating maximal oxygen uptake in epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121:382–90.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Montoye HJ, Willis 3rd PW, Cunningham DA, Keller JB. Heart rate response to a modified Harvard step test: males and females, age 10–69. Res Q 1969;40:153–62.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Montoye HJ, Willis 3rd PW, Cunningham DA. Heart rate response to submaximal exercise: relation to age and sex. J Gerontol 1968;23:127–33.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Milligan G. Fitness standards for the maritime and coastguard agency and the oil and gas industry [PhD]. University of Portsmouth; 2013.

  13. Peçanha T, Bartels R, Brito LC, Paula-Ribeiro M, Oliveira RS, Goldberger JJ. Methods of assessment of the post-exercise cardiac autonomic recovery: a methodological review. Int J Cardiol 2017;227:795–802.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Darr KC, Bassett DR, Morgan BJ, Thomas DP. Effects of age and training status on heart rate recovery after peak exercise. Am J Physiol 1988;254:H340–3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cole CR, Blackstone EH, Pashkow FJ, Snader CE, Lauer MS. Heart-rate recovery immediately after exercise as a predictor of mortality. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1351–7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Napier JA, Johnson BC, Epstein FH. The Tecumseh, Michigan community health study. In: Kessler II, Levin ML, editors. The community as an epidemiologic laboratory: a casebook of community studies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins; 1970.

  17. Hawthorne V. Tecumseh community health study, 1959–1969. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR); 1989 [Distributor].

  18. Hayner NS, Kjelsberg MO, Epstein FH, Francis Jr T. Carbohydrate tolerance and diabetes in a total community, Tecumseh, Michigan. 1. Effects of age, sex, and test conditions on one-hour glucose tolerance in adults. Diabetes 1965;14:413–23.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D’Agostino Sr RB, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, Wolf PA, Cobain M, Massaro JM, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2008; 117:743–53.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fleg JL, Morrell CH, Bos AG, Brant LJ, Talbot LA, Wright JG, et al. Accelerated longitudinal decline of aerobic capacity in healthy older adults. Circulation 2005;112:674–82.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Davies CT. Limitations to the prediction of maximum oxygen intake from cardiac frequency measurements. J Appl Physiol 1968;24:700–6.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ã…strand P-O, Rodahl K. Textbook of work physiology: physiological bases of exercise. New York, London: McGraw-Hill; 1986.

  23. Carnethon MR, Gulati M, Greenland P. Prevalence and cardiovascular disease correlates of low cardiorespiratory fitness in adolescents and adults. JAMA 2005;294:2981–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cooper KH, Pollock ML, Martin RP, White SR, Linnerud AC, Jackson A. Physical fitness levels vs selected coronary risk factors. A cross-sectional study. JAMA 1976;236:166–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jette M, Sidney K, Quenneville J, Landry F. Relation between cardiorespiratory fitness and selected risk factors for coronary heart disease in a population of Canadian men and women. CMAJ 1992;146:1353–60.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chaturvedi N, Bathula R, Shore AC, Panerai R, Potter J, Kooner J, et al. South Asians have elevated postexercise blood pressure and myocardial oxygen consumption compared to Europeans despite equivalent resting pressure. J Am Heart Assoc 2012;1:e000281.

  27. Kokkinos P, Pittaras A, Narayan P, Faselis C, Singh S, Manolis A. Exercise capacity and blood pressure associations with left ventricular mass in prehypertensive individuals. Hypertension 2007;49:55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schultz MG, Otahal P, Cleland VJ, Blizzard L, Marwick TH, Sharman JE. Exercise-induced hypertension, cardiovascular events, and mortality in patients undergoing exercise stress testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens 2013;26:357–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alun D. Hughes.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license. https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hughes, A.D., Chaturvedi, N. Estimation of maximal oxygen consumption and heart rate recovery using the Tecumseh sub-maximal step test and their relationship to cardiovascular risk factors. Artery Res 18, 29–35 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2017.02.005

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2017.02.005

Keywords