Skip to main content

Shock index for outcome and risk stratification in acute pulmonary embolism

Abstract

Introduction

Risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is crucial in deciding appropriate therapy management. Shock index (SI) is rapidly available and a reliable parameter. We aimed to investigate SI for short term outcome in acute PE.

Materials and methods

Data of 182 patients with acute PE were analysed retrospectively. SI was defined as heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure. Logistic regression models were calculated to investigate associations between SI and in-hospital-death, myocardial necrosis and presence of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) respectively. Moreover ROC curves and cut-off values for SI predicting in-hospital death, myocardial necrosis and RVD were computed.

Results

182 patients (61.5% female, mean age 68.5 ± 15.3 years) with acute PE event were included in the study. 5 patients (2.7%) died an in-hospital death.

Logistic regression models revealed an association between SI and respectively in-hospital death (OR 5.854, 95% CI 1.876–18.274, P = 0.00234), myocardial necrosis (OR 5.043, 95% CI 1.362–18.674, P = 0.0154) and RVD (OR 53.539, 95% CI 6.810–420.914, P = 0.000155).

ROC analysis for SI predicting in-hospital death, myocardial necrosis and RVD revealed an AUC of 0.806, 0.636 and 0.713 respectively with respectively SI cut-off values of 0.89, 0.75 and 0.54.

Conclusions

SI is a significant predictor of in-hospital death, myocardial necrosis and RVD. The effectiveness of SI to predict in-hospital death is high with an optimal cut-off value of 0.89 for differentiation between PE patients with lower and higher risk to die in hospital after acute PE event.

References

  1. Sam A, Sanchez D, Gomez V, Wagner C, Kopecna D, Zamarro C, et al. The shock index and the simplified pesi for identification of low-risk patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Respir J Off J Eur Soc Clin Respir Physiol 2011;37:762–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Konstantinides S, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, Danchin N, Fitzmaurice D, Galie N, et al. 2014 esc guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the task force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the european society of cardiology (esc)endorsed by the european respiratory society (ers). Eur Heart J 2014;35(43):3033–69.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jaff MR, McMurtry MS, Archer SL, Cushman M, Goldenberg N, Goldhaber SZ, et al. Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a scientific statement from the american heart association. Circulation 2011;123:1788–830.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tapson VF. Acute pulmonary embolism. N. Engl J Med 2008; 358:1037–52.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meyer G, Vicaut E, Konstantinides SV. Fibrinolysis for intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. N. Engl J Med 2014; 371:581–2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M. Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the international cooperative pulmonary embolism registry (icoper). Lancet 1999;353:1386–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Keller K, Beule J, Coldewey M, Dippold W, Balzer JO. Heart rate in pulmonary embolism. Intern Emerg Med 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Keller K, Beule J, Balzer JO, Dippold W. Blood pressure for outcome prediction and risk stratification in acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Emerg Med 2015;33:1617–21.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, Danchin N, Fitzmaurice D, Galie N, et al. 2014 esc guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 2014;35:3033–69. 3069a-3069k.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jimenez D, Aujesky D, Moores L, Gomez V, Lobo JL, Uresandi F, et al. Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1383–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Aujesky D, Obrosky DS, Stone RA, Auble TE, Perrier A, Cornuz J, et al. Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;172: 1041–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kucher N, Goldhaber SZ. Cardiac biomarkers for risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 2003;108:2191–4.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Galle C, Papazyan JP, Miron MJ, Slosman D, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Prediction of pulmonary embolism extent by clinical findings, d-dimer level and deep vein thrombosis shown by ultrasound. Thromb Haemost 2001;86:1156–60.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Torbicki A, Perrier A, Konstantinides S, Agnelli G, Galie N, Pruszczyk P, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the task force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the european society of cardiology (esc). Eur Heart J 2008;29: 2276–315.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schellhaass A, Walther A, Konstantinides S, Bottiger BW. The diagnosis and treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. Dtsch Arzteblatt Int 2010;107:589–95.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schmitz-Rode T, Janssens U, Duda SH, Erley CM, Gunther RW. Massive pulmonary embolism: percutaneous emergency treatment by pigtail rotation catheter. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36: 375–80.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Otero R, Trujillo-Santos J, Cayuela A, Rodriguez C, Barron M, Martin JJ, et al. Haemodynamically unstable pulmonary embolism in the riete registry: systolic blood pressure or shock index? Eur Respir J Off J Eur Soc Clin Respir Physiol 2007;30: 1111–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kilic T, Ermis H, Gulbas G, Kaya O, Aytemur ZA, Inceoglu F, et al. Prognostic role of the simplified pulmonary embolism severity index and the shock index in pulmonary embolism. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2014.

  19. Mutschler M, Nienaber U, Munzberg M, Wolfl C, Schoechl H, Paffrath T, et al. The shock index revisited – a fast guide to transfusion requirement? A retrospective analysis on 21,853 patients derived from the traumaregister dgu. Crit Care 2013; 17. R172.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Huang B, Yang Y, Zhu J, Liang Y, Tan H, Yu L, et al. Usefulness of the admission shock index for predicting short-term outcomes in patients with st-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2014;114:1315–21.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Berger T, Green J, Horeczko T, Hagar Y, Garg N, Suarez A, et al. Shock index and early recognition of sepsis in the emergency department: pilot study. West J Emerg Med 2013; 14:168–74.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liu YC, Liu JH, Fang ZA, Shan GL, Xu J, Qi ZW, et al. Modified shock index and mortality rate of emergency patients. World J Emerg Med 2012;3:114–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Toosi MS, Merlino JD, Leeper KV. Prognostic value of the shock index along with transthoracic echocardiography in risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 2008;101:700–5.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rady MY, Nightingale P, Little RA, Edwards JD. Shock index: a re-evaluation in acute circulatory failure. Resuscitation 1992; 23:227–34.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rady MY, Rivers EP, Martin GB, Smithline H, Appelton T, Nowak RM. Continuous central venous oximetry and shock index in the emergency department: use in the evaluation of clinical shock. Am J Emerg Med 1992;10:538–41.

    Google Scholar 

  26. King RW, Plewa MC, Buderer NM, Knotts FB. Shock index as a marker for significant injury in trauma patients. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med 1996;3:1041–5.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wira CR, Francis MW, Bhat S, Ehrman R, Conner D, Siegel M. The shock index as a predictor of vasopressor use in emergency department patients with severe sepsis. West J Emerg Med 2014;15:60–6.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Masotti L, Mannucci A, Antonelli F, Maurini V, Testa R, Marchetti S, et al. The risk-based treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. J Clin Med Res 2009;1:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kucher N, Luder CM, Dornhofer T, Windecker S, Meier B, Hess OM. Novel management strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 2003;24:366–76.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Keller K, Beule J, Schulz A, Dippold W. Troponin i as risk stratification marker in acute pulmonary artery embolism. Phlebologie 2013;42:261–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Janata K, Holzer M, Laggner AN, Mullner M. Cardiac troponin t in the severity assessment of patients with pulmonary embolism: cohort study. BMJ 2003;326:312–3.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kucher N, Wallmann D, Carone A, Windecker S, Meier B, Hess OM. Incremental prognostic value of troponin i and echocardiography in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1651–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karsten Keller.

Additional information

The study was conducted in St. Vincenz and Elisabeth Hospital Mainz (KKM).

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license. https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keller, K., Coldewey, M., Geyer, M. et al. Shock index for outcome and risk stratification in acute pulmonary embolism. Artery Res 15, 30–35 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2016.05.002

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2016.05.002

Keywords