- Abstract
- Poster Presentations
- Open access
- Published:
P1.38 Conversion Between Definitions of Pulse Wave Velocity
Artery Research volume 2, page 101 (2008)
Abstract
Background
Different methodologies for determination of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) exist. Distance (L) can be measured from carotid-femoral measurement sites (Ldirect) or obtained by subtracting carotid-sternum from sternum-femoral distances (Lsubtracted). Transit times are usually obtained either by detection of the maximal upstroke (Δtmaximal upstroke) or the foot (Δtintersecting tangent) of the waveform at the measurement sites. This study investigates conversion factors between PWV methodologies.
Methods
3043 subjects in which both distance measurements were available were divided into model and validation groups (1502/1541 subjects, respectively). In the model population the main determinants of the ratiodistance = Lsubtracted/Ldirect were determined and a multivariate model was constructed. Estimated ratiodistance,est was used to convert from PWVdirect to PWVsubtracted,est in the validation population. PWVsubtracted,est was compared to measured PWVsubtracted. Ninety three subjects in which both transit times were available were divided into model and validation groups (46/47 subjects, respectively). In the model population a model for estimation of Δtmaximal upstroke,est from Δtintersecting tangent was constructed and used to estimate Δtmaximal upstroke,est in the validation population. Δtmaximal upstroke,est was compared to measured Δtmaximal upstroke. Data are presented as mean(stdev).
Results
The main determinants of ratiodistance were age (R2 = 0.17) and BMI (R2 = 0.15) (combined: R2 = 0.27, all P<0.001). PWVsubtracted,est correlated well with PWVsubtracted (R = 0.97, P<0.001) with mean difference of 0.0007 (0.40) m/s. Δtmaximal upstroke,est correlated well with Δtmaximal upstroke,est (R = 0.82, P<0.001) and mean difference of 0.58 (1.03) m/s.
Conclusions
Differences in absolute PWV values are important to compensate for in order to compare between studies. The models proposed allow for such conversion.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Vermeersch, S.J., Rietzschel, E., Gillebert, T.C. et al. P1.38 Conversion Between Definitions of Pulse Wave Velocity. Artery Res 2, 101 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2008.08.345
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2008.08.345